Home/ Questions/Q 606127
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-13T17:13:16+00:00

Should all routes in ASP.net MVC follow a Only slashes, no QueryString philosophy? I’m

  • 0

Should all routes in ASP.net MVC follow a “Only slashes, no QueryString” philosophy?

I’m working on a Wiki software, so I have routes like

/{pageTitle}
/{pageTitle/Edit
/{pageTitle/History

etc. for all actions, but what if I want to control the behavior of an Action? Is something like

/{pageTitle}?noredirect=true

okay or considered bad practice? If the latter, is there a better option? Should I create a separate route

/{pageTitle}/NoRedirect

instead?

I think it’s clean, but then again I’ve never written a complicated MVC application that would need passing options to the action before 🙂

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I believe there’s no definite answer to this.

    But to me, it feels more natural to just have controller & action related parts in the left part of the URL and have the “optional” parameters in the QueryString.

    While it’s clear that ;

    • /{pageTitle} will show the article ,
    • /{pageTitle}/Edit will edit the artice,
    • /{pageTitle}/History will show the history of that artice

    /{pageTitle}/NoRedirect doesn’t really ring a bell.
    But it’s a bit more obvious that /{pageTitle}?noredirect=true modifies the behaviour of the action.

    So I would go with /{pageTitle}?noredirect=true in your case.

    • 0