Should I test if something is valid or just try to do it and catch the exception?
- Is there any solid documentation saying that one way is preferred?
- Is one way more pythonic?
For example, should I:
if len(my_list) >= 4:
x = my_list[3]
else:
x = 'NO_ABC'
Or:
try:
x = my_list[3]
except IndexError:
x = 'NO_ABC'
Some thoughts…
PEP 20 says:
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.
Should using a try instead of an if be interpreted as an error passing silently? And if so, are you explicitly silencing it by using it in this way, therefore making it OK?
I’m not referring to situations where you can only do things 1 way; for example:
try:
import foo
except ImportError:
import baz
You should prefer
try/exceptoverif/elseif that results inOften, these go hand-in-hand.
speed-ups
In the case of trying to find an element in a long list by:
the try, except is the best option when the
indexis probably in the list and the IndexError is usually not raised. This way you avoid the need for an extra lookup byif index < len(my_list).Python encourages the use of exceptions, which you handle is a phrase from Dive Into Python. Your example not only handles the exception (gracefully), rather than letting it silently pass, also the exception occurs only in the exceptional case of index not being found (hence the word exception!).
cleaner code
The official Python Documentation mentions EAFP: Easier to ask for forgiveness than permission and Rob Knight notes that catching errors rather than avoiding them, can result in cleaner, easier to read code. His example says it like this:
Worse (LBYL ‘look before you leap’):
Better (EAFP: Easier to ask for forgiveness than permission):