Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7923227
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T17:14:33+00:00 2026-06-03T17:14:33+00:00

Should one use @property for variables that will be accessed very often, such as

  • 0

Should one use @property for variables that will be accessed very often, such as the position of a particle? @property creates getters and setter for a variable which adds the overhead of calling a method. In most situations this is not noticeable, but what if the property is accessed up to a million times a second (within different instances)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T17:14:35+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 5:14 pm

    You are correct that the Objective-C runtime will add a certain amount of overhead for @property accessors. However, this is the accepted way to share information between Objective-C classes. You should only consider a different approach if you have measured your application and determined that the @property overhead is actually a processing bottleneck.

    Keep in mind that a modern processor operates in the GHz range, and something happening “a million times per second” is only in the MHz range. Chances are, your bottlenecks will be somewhere else.

    If you do have a problem, you can always do your particle processing on an array of simple Particle structures inside of a larger Objective-C ParticleCloud class. That would allow the rest of your program to ignore the exact implementation of the Particle objects, while removing the need for @property accessors.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What tasks should one not use HBase for? My understanding is that HBase and
One should always use std::string over c-style strings( char * ) is advice that
When should one use the f:viewAction or preRenderView event to initialize data for a
Possible Duplicate: When should one use final? When should Java programmers prefer to use
When exposing some code to D-Bus using Qt D-Bus bindings, when should one use
Are there any counterindications to fork under mod_perl2? Should one use another way to
What is a jagged array (in c#)? Any examples and when should one use
I'm a little confused as to which one I should use. I think either
I'm having trouble choosing between Boost.Any and Boost.Variant. When should I use each one?
Should one create unit tests involving IO? Ie, testing a class method for serializing/deserializing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.