Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 75543
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:31:57+00:00 2026-05-10T20:31:57+00:00

Since there is no finally in C++ you have to use the RAII design

  • 0

Since there is no finally in C++ you have to use the RAII design pattern instead, if you want your code to be exception safe. One way to do this is by using the destructor of a local class like this:

void foo() {     struct Finally {         ~Finally() { /* cleanup code */ }     } finalizer();     // ...code that might throw an exception... } 

This is a big advantage over the straight forward solution, because you don’t have to write the cleanup code 2 times:

try {     // ...code that might throw an exception...     // cleanup code (no exception) } catch (...) {     // cleanup code (exception)     throw; } 

A big disadvantage of the local class solution is that you can’t directly access local variables in your cleanup code. So it will bloat your code a lot if you need access to them regardless:

void foo() {     Task* task;     while (task = nextTask()) {         task->status = running;         struct Finally {             Task* task;             Finally(Task* task) : task(task) {}             ~Finally() { task->status = idle; }         } finalizer(task);         // ...code that might throw an exception...     } } 

So my question is: Is there a solution which combines both advantages? So that you a) don’t have to write duplicate code and b) can access local variables in the cleanup code, like task in the last example, but without such code bloat.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:31:58+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:31 pm

    Instead of defining struct Finally, you could extract your cleanup code in a function of the class Task and use Loki’s ScopeGuard.

    ScopeGuard guard = MakeGuard(&Task::cleanup, task); 

    See also this DrDobb’s article and this other article for more about ScopeGuards.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 62k
  • Answers 62k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Here's a thought, not sure if this will make a… May 11, 2026 at 10:13 am
  • added an answer Shawn Hargreaves and Nick Gravelyn are two names that I… May 11, 2026 at 10:12 am
  • added an answer These two terms differentiate between two different ways of walking… May 11, 2026 at 10:12 am

Related Questions

Since there is no finally in C++ you have to use the RAII design
Since there is no concept of sessions in ASP.Net MVC and each request is
Since there is apparently no Flash control that can accept bitmap pastes , I
Since I've gotten no answer at all to my question Is there an alternative
Since there is a large pool of passionate developers in this community, I would
I know there is a WeakHashMap in java.util , but since it uses WeakReference
Since Indy is now built-into the install process of Delphi 2009... is there a
Since CS3 doesn't have a web service component, as previous versions had, is there
I have found that there is generally a singe type or namespace that takes
Since XAML gets compiled, there should be no difference in execution of code like

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.