Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7616089
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T02:48:20+00:00 2026-05-31T02:48:20+00:00

So as I understand it you can return objects in C++ by returning pointers

  • 0

So as I understand it you can return objects in C++ by returning pointers to them. But I was under the impression that once a function is finished running, the destructor gets called on all the objects. Why doesn’t the destructor get called on the object you’re returning?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T02:48:21+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 2:48 am

    Only the destructors of objects with automatic storage duration are called when those objects leave their scope (not just a function, but any scope: braces, for-statements, even single-line expressions).

    On the other hand, objects of static storage duration are only destroyed at program exit, and objects of dynamic storage duration (i.e. those created with a new operator) only get destroyed manually on your request.

    When you return a pointer in the way you describe, then almost surely that pointer points to a dynamically created object, and thus it is the responsibility of the recipient of the pointer to see to it that the object is eventually cleaned up. This is the great disadvantage of naked pointers: They do not convey any implicit ownership statement, and you have to provide the information about who’s responsible for the dynamic object manually outside the code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'am new in javascript. I can't understand why the function returns T1 object (not
I can understand the difference between a signed char and an unsigned one. But
So far I can understand HTML.ActionLink and URL.RouteURL but still trying to absorb where
OK so now I can understand that SO's search system is primarily based around
For reasons that only the developers can understand, Firefox will create and open .url
I hope I can explain this well enough so that you can understand the
This is something I can't understand. Let's say that I overload operator & to
I understand that you cannot return a generic list in a standard .asmx webservice.
I can't understend why variable s_return dont work $('.codeinput').change(function() { var s_return=; var to_check=this.value
I can understand the string.Join( ) var stringies1 =new [] {Blood, is, Thicker, Than,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.