Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 922795
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T19:05:25+00:00 2026-05-15T19:05:25+00:00

So here I am looking at this huge oracle 10g table. I looked at

  • 0

So here I am looking at this huge oracle 10g table. I looked at its indexes and see that ALL of the columns are under one unique index. Does this provide actually provide any performance benefits?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T19:05:26+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:05 pm

    Possibly, possibly not. It could be that the unique index is implementing a constraint to ensure that rows are indeed unique, and is not intended to help with performance at all. There could be a performance benefit for indexed lookup queries, because they won’t need to access the actual table at all.

    On the face of it it sounds like this should have been created as an INDEX ORGANIZED table.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So I'm looking here and I see the command line switches. http://mono-project.com/Command_Line_MoMA This is
I tried looking this up on here but couldnt find a proper answer. I
Alright...I am here looking for some bread crumbs. This is my code: using System;
I'm not looking to keyword spam here, and this question is in the least
Again, I'm here looking for your wisdom, in this case, I need to learn
Spent a bunch of time looking at this.. It seems that what little info
Per this blog post here ( http://www.david-lewis.com/css/css-that-can-affect-performance-on-ipad-web-apps-or-phonegap/ ), there is a bug in iOS
I'm fairly new to groovy, looking at some existing code, and I see this:
This is related to a question I asked here: Thread Locking in Ruby (use
Right, simple question here. I couldn't find an answer using google and looking here.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.