Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8983373
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T20:49:32+00:00 2026-06-15T20:49:32+00:00

So, here is my issue, I have a given object which is an IEnumerable

  • 0

So, here is my issue, I have a given object which is an IEnumerable and I have been guaranteed that said collection will always have at most 4 elements. Now, for a reason that is not important, I’d like to be able to, in some elegant way, “force” the collection to contain 4 elements if it has any less.

I’ve already done some research and the most convincig candidate is Zip, but it stops zipping after it reaches the shortest collection’s end.

Is there any way of doing this without making my own extension method?
To better explain myself:

var list1 = new List<Dog> {
    new Dog { Name = "Puppy" }
}
var list2 = new List<Dog> {
    new Dog { Name = "Puppy1" },
    new Dog { Name = "Puppy2" },
    new Dog { Name = "Puppy3" },
    new Dog { Name = "Puppy4" },
}

var other1 = list1.ExtendToNElements(4).ToList();
//Now other1's first element is an instance of Dog with Name = "Puppy"
//And the following 3 elements are null, or have a Dog with no name
//I don't really care about that

var other2 = list2.ExtendToNElements(4).ToList();
//other2 is the same as list2, nothing got added.

Thanks in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T20:49:34+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 8:49 pm

    Quick one-liner (which should count as “doable without an extension method”):

    public static IEnumerable<TItem> Extend<TItem>(
                this IEnumerable<TItem> source, 
                int n)
    {
        return source.Concat(Enumerable.Repeat(default(TItem), n))
                     .Take(n);
    }
    

    Since Repeat takes an explicit count, passing in n gives a reasonable upper bound. The elements are generated on-demand anyway. Using source.Count() would force execution of source which isn’t ideal.

    Slightly more overengineered and flexible version:

    public static IEnumerable<TItem> Extend<TItem>(
                this IEnumerable<TItem> source, 
                int n, 
                Func<TItem> with) 
    {
        return source.Concat(
            from i in Enumerable.Range(0, n) select with()
        ).Take(n);
    }
    
    public static IEnumerable<TItem> Extend<TItem>(
                this IEnumerable<TItem> source, 
                int n, 
                TItem with = default(TItem)) 
    {
        return source.Extend(n, with: () => with);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's the issue: I have 2 data contexts that I would like to do
Here's the issue: I have a list of App names that I want to
Having an issue here that I have tried everything I can think of but
Here's a brief rundown of my issue: I have a JavaScript function that gets
I have a feeling this will be a quick fix, given that I started
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
I have issue about convert XML to Java Object , in here i use
Working with Reporting Services 2008 r2. So here's my issue: We have 5 reports
So I'm not to OOP in PHP. Here is my issue I have a
I'm have a weird issue here. I have a UITableView using custom UITableViewCells. Everything

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.