Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 125483
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T05:09:58+00:00 2026-05-11T05:09:58+00:00

So here’s an issue at my work. I’ve got a few TestNG cases that,

  • 0

So here’s an issue at my work. I’ve got a few TestNG cases that, if run within the primary batch of test cases, wreak havock throughout the other test cases. Rather than going through and changing all our test cases, I’ve made a group for the involved cases. I run the main test suite, excluding that group, and then make a second Ant call to run the affected group. This way all test cases pass, but I’m ending up having to create two TestNG reports so that the first one doesn’t get overriden with the results from the second group.

So here’s my question: is it possible to merge the second test result report with the first, or am I stuck with the two?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T05:09:58+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:09 am

    I think that the only way you would be able to do this is to process the TestNG XML output after the two runs. You should be able to collate the XML files from the two runs and combine it into a single HTML report using the Ant JUnit Report task.

    If you aren’t happy with the output you get from this, it could be because TestNG organises its JUnit XML output oddly. You get better results (in my opinion) if you use the JUnitXMLReporter from my ReportNG project and run JUnit Report on that.

    Alternatively, you might be able to use this XSLT reporter for TestNG to combine the XML output from the two test runs into a single HTML report, though I’ve no idea if it supports this or not.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.