Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3220822
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:48:20+00:00 2026-05-17T15:48:20+00:00

So here’s the basic problem: I’d like to be able to store various fields

  • 0

So here’s the basic problem: I’d like to be able to store various fields in a database. These can be short textfields (maybe 150 characters max, probably more like 50 in general) and long textfields (something that can store a whole page full of text). Ideally more types can be added later on.

These fields are group by common field_group ids, and their type shouldn’t really have anything to do with categorization.

So what’s the best way to represent this in MySQL? One table with a short_text and long_text columns of differing types, one of which is to be NULL? Or is there a more elegant solution?

(I’d like this to be primarily driven by ease to select all fields with a given field_group_id.)

Clarification

I’m essentially attempting to allow users to create their own tables, but without actually creating tables.

So you’d have a ‘Book’ field group, which would have the fields ‘Name’ (short text), ‘Summary’ (long text). Then you would be able to create entries into that book. I realize that this is essentially the whole point of MySQL, but I need to have a LOT of these and don’t want users creating whole tables in my database.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:48:20+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:48 pm

    What you are looking for is called an EAV. With an EAV model you can build any freaking database in the world with only inserts. But it’s really horrible for a lot of reasons but yours sounds so looney-tunes, it could work.

    Build an Entity table

    In here you’d list

    • Car
    • Person
    • Plant

    Build an Attribute Table.

    Here you’d list the PK from Entity and the list of attributes.

    I’ll use the word instead of a number PK.

    • Car | Engine Cylinders
    • Car | Doors
    • Car | Make
    • Person | First Name
    • Person | Last Name

    then in a third table you’d list the actual values for each one, again using the words but you’d have numbers.

    • Car | Engine Cylinders | 4
    • Car | Doors | 4
    • Car | Make | Honda
    • Person | First Name | Stephanie
    • Person | Last Name | Page

    If you want to get tricky instead on one column for value you could have 4 columns

    • a number
    • a varchar
    • a date
    • a clob

    then in the Attribute table you could add a column that says which column to put the data.

    If you plan on this database being “Multitenent” you’ll need to add an OWNER table as the parent of the entity table, so you and I could both have a Car entity.

    But this SUCKS to query, SUCKS to index, SUCKS to use for anything else but a toy app.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here is a simplification of my database: Table: Property Fields: ID, Address Table: Quote
Here's a coding problem for those that like this kind of thing. Let's see
Here's a basic regex technique that I've never managed to remember. Let's say I'm
Here's a problem I ran into recently. I have attributes strings of the form
Here's an interesting problem. On a recently installed Server 2008 64bit I opened IE
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here is my code, which takes two version identifiers in the form 1, 5,
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes
Here we go again, the old argument still arises... Would we better have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.