Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 999375
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:20:34+00:00 2026-05-16T07:20:34+00:00

so I have written several stored procedures that act on individual rows of data

  • 0

so I have written several stored procedures that act on individual rows of data by taking in an ID number. I would like to keep several stored procedures that can call this stored procedure at different levels of my database scheme. For instance, when a row is inserted I call this stored procedure. When something else is modified I would like to call this stored procedure for each line. This is so I can have one set of base code that can be called everywhere else but that acts on different amounts of data. I have been able to produce this result with Cursors, but I am told these are very inefficient. Is there any other way to produce this kind of functionality without sacrificing performance? Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:20:35+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:20 am

    Yes. Use standard joins to operate on sets rather than RBAR (Row By Agonising Row). i.e. Rather than call a function for each row, design a join that performs the required operation on every applicable row as a set operation.

    I often see devs use the ‘function operates on a each row’, and although this seems to be the obvious way to encapsulate logic, it doesn’t perform well on SQL Server or most DB engines.

    In some circumstances, a table-valued function can be used effectively (MS SQL Server).

    (BTW, you are correct in saying cursors are inefficient).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have written a Scala (2.9.1-1) application that needs to process several million rows
I have written several procedures and succesfully implemented them on my webhost's server. However
I have written a C# app that runs constantly in a loop and several
I have written a console application in Delphi that queries information from several locations.
I have written a WinForms application (C# 2.0, VS2008) that registers several file types
I have an application that called several other .exe components written in delphi. The
I have a simple application written in C# and .Net 2.0 that displays several
I have written a library that exposes references to several related object types. All
I have written a base class from which I wish to derive several child
I have written the majority of my project in C++. However there are several

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.