Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8141055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T12:22:12+00:00 2026-06-06T12:22:12+00:00

So I know from various online sources that it is generally a no-no to

  • 0

So I know from various online sources that it is generally a no-no to call a virtual function from within a constructor. I realize that the problem here is that the base class will be constructed first and C++ will call the Base class’ version of the function first. However I have a unique use case that might be okay with this. I’d appreciate some comments. Consider this situation.

class Base
{
public:
    Base(string data)
    {
        Parse(data);
    }
    ~Base(){}
private:
    virtual Parse(string data);
}

class Derived : public Base
{
public:
    Derived(string data)
    {
        Parse(data);
    }
    ~Derived();
private:
    Parse(string data);
}

Let’s say I have a setup like this and my expected behavior of each derived class is that:

  1. Parse gets called in the base class to parse out what should be common to all these input strings.
  2. The derived parse should get the data that is specific to the derived class.

Does it make sense to use virtual functions in the constructor in this case? Or am I forced to make “parse” public and call it each time I construct this class? Or are there other suggestions.

I hope this makes sense, and please forgive any syntactical errors above, I’m just trying to express a general idea.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T12:22:15+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    The solution is quite simple:

    class Base
    {
    public:
        Base(string data)
        {
            Parse(data);
        }
        ~Base(){}
    private:
        void Parse(string data);
    }
    
    class Derived : public Base
    {
    public:
        Derived(string data)
        {
            ParseMore(data);
        }
        ~Derived();
    private:
        void ParseMore(string data);
    }
    

    When Derived is constructed, the constructor of Base is called before you enter the constructor of Derived.
    So the parsing taking place in Base will be finished, and you can finish the parsing in your Derived constructor.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From the various online articles on Java 7 I have come to know that
I know from here that I can pass an ignore option in the jQuery.validate
Background I have a backoffice that manages information from various sources. Part of the
I have an MSMQ that receives XML format messages from various sources. I have
I know from wikipedia for example that exception handling is used in an application
I know from reading the assoc. Google group that there is not currently an
I know from Algebra class that with ABC and 123 we can make 216
OK, so I know that from-import is exactly the same as import , except
I have put together some code from various sources but javascript is somewhat unknown
I have cobbled together some scripts from various internet sources to get a form

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.