Home/ Questions/Q 951061
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-15T23:40:13+00:00

So, I need to find an Excel 2003 substitute for =SUMIFS, which is only

  • 0

So, I need to find an Excel 2003 substitute for =SUMIFS, which is only 2007+ (apparently).

The formula is used to generate this summary data table, from a list of revenue, where each revenue line has the field type (static, email or outreach) and the field fund (ABC, QRS and XYZ).

type    fund    total   count   average
static  ABC $12,390.88  171 $72.46
email   ABC $6,051.32   65  $93.10
outreach    ABC $8,835.00   138 $64.02
static  QRS $12,925.44  79  $163.61
email   QRS $9,305.44   99  $93.99
outreach    QRS $1,799.00   49  $36.71
static  XYZ $4,912.20   36  $136.45
email   XYZ $75.00  2   $37.50
outreach    XYZ $0.00   0   #DIV/0!

This is the formula

      `=SUMIFS('revenue'!G:G,'revenue'!AH:AH,Sheet2!A2,'revenue'!AI:AI,Sheet2!B2)`

Where G is a dollar amount, and AH and AI are matching the type or fund column.

How do i get this to work in Excel 2003?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The way I ended up getting past this was to create a column that combined the two columns I needed to check (ABCstatic, ABCemail, etc.) Doing it this way allowed me to use just one ‘SUMIF’ (using two SUMIF clauses linked together results in OR-ing of the conditions, rather than AND-ing).

    =SUMIF(Revenue!AJ2:AJ6400,Sheet2!A2, Revenue!G2:G6400)

    • 0