Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6713619
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T08:24:06+00:00 2026-05-26T08:24:06+00:00

So I never know what to do here. Say you have Order, which has_one

  • 0

So I never know what to do here.

Say you have Order, which has_one Member.

If you call say, my_order.member.first_name where that associated member has been deleted, you can a nilClass error. I can do my_order.member.try(:first_name).. but that just seems like a dumb workaround. I don’t want to stick a bunch of tries everywhere.

I’ve read [this article] on Nil objects: http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/8181879506/if-you-gaze-into-nil-nil-gazes-also-into-you?

Good stuff. But I would think rails has something handy for this since it’s so common.. instead of writing your own custom nilClass or something.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T08:24:07+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:24 am

    You can use delegate, and you end up with my_order.first_name

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's something I know is probably possible but I've never managed to do In
I do not currently have this issue , but you never know, and thought
I never really know what order is the best installation or if it even
I know that #define s, etc. are normally never indented. Why? I'm working in
Although I know the basic concepts of binary representation, I have never really written
Say I have a list of n elements, I know there are n! possible
Say I have a multiple inheritance scenario: class A(object): # code for A here
I have a database that has four columns like this level_1, level_2, level_3, level_4
Let's say I have a javascript method that takes a little to long to
Let's say I have a Car class in a game that can be played

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.