Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7076597
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T06:19:03+00:00 2026-05-28T06:19:03+00:00

So I thought it would be a nice idea to name a function that

  • 0

So I thought it would be a nice idea to name a function that calculates the exponential ^, but it seems like the caret actually does something special, as the Clojure REPL generates an error when evaluating '^. Googling mostly gave me this, so I was wondering what the actualy use for the caret in Clojure is.

(Also, would it be possible after all to name a function ^?)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T06:19:03+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 6:19 am

    ^ is “the meta character” it tells the reader to add the symbol starting with ^ as metadata to the next symbol (provided it is something that implements IMetas)

    user=> (def x ^:IamMeta [1 2 3])
    #'user/x
    user=> x
    [1 2 3]
    user=> (meta x)
    {:tag :IamMeta}
    user=> 
    

    You can learn a lot about how clojure works under the hood by looking at the meta of things, for instance functions:

    user=> (meta foo)                          
    {:ns #<Namespace user>, 
     :name foo, :file "NO_SOURCE_PATH", 
     :line 5, :arglists ([s])}
    

    this is very often used for type hints

    (defn foo [^String s] (.charAt s 1))
    

    it is generally a good idea to turn on reflection warnings (set! *warn-on-reflection* true) and then add type hints until the warnings go away. without these Clojure will look up the type of the function operands at run-time, which saves you the trouble of fussing with types though at a slight cost.

    PS: My next favorite reader character is the “dispatch” character #, it is well worth learning about it next 🙂

    PPS: this is different in clojure 1.2.x vs clojure 1.3.x
    in Clojure 1.2.1 metadata does not compose when you use the meta-character:

    user=> (def foo ^:foo ^:bar [1 2 3])
    #'user/foo
    user=> (meta foo)
    {:tag :foo}
    

    and in 1.3 it “does the right thing” and also keywords are options instead of “tags”:

    user=> (def foo ^:foo ^:bar [1 2 3])
    #'user/foo
    user=> (meta foo)
    {:foo true, :bar true}
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This discussion started over here but I thought it would be nice to have
Today I thought it would be a nice idea to overload operator<< for C
I am developing my portfolio website and I thought that it would be nice
Yesterday I thought it would be nice to implement my own Trigger in a
Just listening to this week's podcast and thought it would be nice to group
I'm having trouble with something that I thought would be easy... I can't get
I would have thought this would be an easy one to Google, but I've
I wrote a program that simulates soft bodies using springs. It looks nice but
I'm currently learning C++ and so I thought it would be a good idea
Hey, I'm learning C# and just thought of a cool idea. Considering that a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.