Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8216109
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T12:01:05+00:00 2026-06-07T12:01:05+00:00

So I was reading this book where it says that if I create a

  • 0

So I was reading this book where it says that if I create a class Point and then instantiate it by doing Point p1 = new Point(); then I will have:

  • a Point object on the heap (as a result of the “new” keyword);
  • a reference to this object (p1);
  • and when an object has no references then it can be disposed by the garbage collector.

I guess I got the meaning, but it got me thinking. What happens “memory-wise” with primitive types and strings, i.e. what is the difference between:

 - int x1 = 100;
 - String s1 = "hello";

and

 - int x2 = new Integer(100);
 - String s2 = new String("hello");

In the first case, are ‘100’ and ‘hello’ going to be instantiated and stored on the heap? Else, what are x1 and s1 referencing?

Thank you!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T12:01:06+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 12:01 pm

    First of all:

     int x2 = new Integer(100);
    

    This means an Integer object is created, outboxed (the JVM returns its intValue) and 100 assigned to an int primitive. The Integer object is no longer referenced and can be disposed (of course maybe the JIT can optimize that to int x2 = 100).

    I assume you are talking about local variables, because attributes are part of the object and so lie with it in the heap.

     int x1 = 100;
    

    An int variable is declared in the stack and assigned a value

     String s1 = "Hello";
    

    An String object is created (or referenced, see String.intern()) and a pointer is added to the stack.

    The other possibilities are exactly the same.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm new to functional programming and as I'm reading this book. It basically says
I am reading a book saying that in C++ you can't do this: int
Reading along with the agile book, it says this in a footnote: ... You
I'm reading a book about C++. The author shows this enum: [Flags] enum class
i'm reading this book (Head First Object Oriented Design & Analysis). In chapter 5
Reading a book (VS 2010), it says that commands (statements) in .NET Csharp cannot
I am reading a book about Java and it says that you can declare
I'm reading a book about parallel programming an it says that it's not thread
After reading this article I made a point that int () yields 0 because
The book I am reading says that SQL Server supports two kinds of character

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.