Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6336147
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T18:59:34+00:00 2026-05-24T18:59:34+00:00

So, if I have a device (or global ) function that creates/copies some data

  • 0

So, if I have a device (or global) function that creates/copies some data into shared memory and I later call another device function, like so:

__global__ void a(){ 
    __shared__ int blah=0;
    fun();
}
__device__ void fun(){
   blah = 1; //perform some operations
   //do whatever
}

I’m a bit rusty with my CUDA, I think you might have had to “redefine” shared variable (I assume the operation checked if a shared variable of that name exists, if so assigns it) – this had the effect of creating context – so basically the variable didn’t just come out of nowhere. Alternatively, if it’s similar to having a global variable in standard C/C++ and I can just reference it, like I did above, it’d be great.

I am familiar with memory hierarchy, I’m just rusty on the semantics of creating/referencing memory.

Please advise on whether the above sketch would work. Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T18:59:35+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 6:59 pm

    No that won’t work in CUDA, any more that it would work in standard C99. Currently, the preferred method of __device__ function compilation is inline expansion (they are also compiled as standalone code objects for the Fermi architecture), but even so __device__ functions still must obey standard syntax and scope conventions of C99. So you need to pass arguments which don’t have compilation unit scope by reference to __device__ functions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an external device that spits out UDP packets of binary data and
I have a re-useable function in some CUDA code that needs to be called
I have a kernel that calls a device function inside an if statement. The
I have a device that supports 4-color graphics (much like CGA in the old
I have a device on a network that I am attempting to ping through
We have a device that uses Exchange web services to download mail and calendar
HI, I have a device that exposes a telnet interface which you can log
We have an embedded device that needs to interact with an enterprise software system.
I have an I2C device that wants two inputs: a denominator and a numerator.
I have inherited some really old VC6.0 code that I am upgrading to VS2008

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.