Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 520747
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:10:39+00:00 2026-05-13T08:10:39+00:00

So I’m architecting an application that does necessarily C++ work, but MFC/ATL is too

  • 0

So I’m architecting an application that does necessarily C++ work, but MFC/ATL is too messy for my liking, so I had this brilliant idea of doing all the “thinking” code in native C++ and all the pretty UI code in C#. The problem, though, is interoperability between the two of them. Before I get too carried away with this, I was wondering if this is a solved problem, and there’s a really good way to do this. Note that I don’t want to mix logic and display in the same module, as it gives rise to annoyingly high coupling.

Here’s what I have so far:

enter image description here

So tell me, can it be done better?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:10:40+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:10 am

    The easiest way to handle this is to use C++/CLI, and expose your logic as .NET types.

    It’s very easy to wrap a native C++ class in a ref class that’s usuable directly from a C# user interface.

    That being said – this was my plan, originally, in my current project. My thinking was that I’d need the native code for some of the heavy math work we typically do. I’ve found, however, that it’s been easier, faster, and nicer to just move most of my logic directly into C# (separated from the UI code, but still in a C# assembly) rather than try to implement it in C++.

    My experience has been that speed has not been an issue – unsafe C# code has nearly always managed to be as fast or faster than the equivelent C++ when tuned, and it’s easier to profile and tune the C# code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.