Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8549889
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T13:49:28+00:00 2026-06-11T13:49:28+00:00

So I’m creating a library that will have a class someBase {}; which will

  • 0

So I’m creating a library that will have a class someBase {}; which will be derived by downstream users in a number of classes.

class someBase {
  public:
    virtual void foo()=0;
};

What I also have, is a vector of pointers to someBase and I’m doing this :-

vector <someBase*> children;

// downstream user code populates children with some objects over here

for (i=0; i<children.size(); i++)
  children[i]->foo();

Now profiling suggests that the branch mispredictions on the virtual calls is one (of the several) bottlenecks in my code. What I’m looking to do is somehow access the RTTI of the objects and use that to sort the vector of children according to class type to improve both instruction cache locality and branch prediction.

Any suggestions/solutions on how this can be done?

The main challenges to keep in mind are :-

1.) I don’t really know which or how many classes are going to be derived from someBase. Hypothetically, I could have a global enum in some common file somewhere that downstream users can edit to add their own class-type and then sort on that (basically implementing my own RTTI). But that’s an ugly solution.

2.) PiotrNycz suggests in his answer below to use type_info. However, only != and == are defined for that. Any ideas on how to derive a strict weak ordering on type_info?

3.) I’m really looking to improve branch prediction and instruction cache locality so if there is an alternative solution, that would also be welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T13:49:29+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 1:49 pm

    There is typeid operator.

    You can use it to define comparator for sorting your objects in vector.

    Like this:

    inline bool compareTypes(BaseClass* obj1, BaseClass* obj2)
    {
       int compareRes = strcmp(typeid(*obj1).name(), typeid(*obj2).name());
       if (compareRes < 0) return true;
       if (compareRes > 0) return false;
       std::less<BaseClass*> ptrComp;
       return ptrComp(obj1, obj2); 
    }
    

    And:

      sort(v.begin(), v.end(), compareTypes);
    

    [UPDATE]

    Thanks for poiting me out that there is a function designed for this goal. It is std::type_info::before(const type_info&) const So the comparator will be as easy as this:

    inline bool compareTypes(A* obj1, A* obj2)
    {
       return typeid(*obj1).before(typeid(*obj2));
    }
    

    My earlier version is not so bad 😉 It can be used for cases where one need to sort also objects of a given class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have an autohotkey script which looks up a word in a bilingual dictionary
I have a text area in my form which accepts all possible characters from
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I have an array which has BIG numbers and small numbers in it. I
I have a .ini file as follows: [playlist] numberofentries=2 File1=http://87.230.82.17:80 Title1=(#1 - 365/1400) Example
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.