Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6934355
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T11:56:57+00:00 2026-05-27T11:56:57+00:00

So I’m trying to refactor some code which creates JDBC objects in a loop

  • 0

So I’m trying to refactor some code which creates JDBC objects in a loop and didn’t close them out cleanly. My first thought is to create a LinkedList to store the prepared statements, result sets, etc., and then close them in a loop inside a finally block. So, the approach is like:

Connection conn = null;
LinkedList<PreparedStatement> statements = new LinkedList<PreparedStatement>();
LinkedList<ResultSet> results = new LinkedList<ResultSet>();

    try {
        conn = database.getConnection(); 

        for (String i : arr1) {
            for (String j : arr2) {

                Statement stmt = conn.createStatement();
                statements.add(stmt);

                ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(...);
                results.add(rs);

                // ...work...

            }
        }

    }
    catch(SQLException ex) {ex.printStackTrace();}
    finally {
        // close all result sets..
        for (ResultSet rs : (ResultSet[])results.toArray()) {
            if (rs != null)   try { rs.close();   } catch (SQLException ex) {ex.printStackTrace();}
        }

        for (Statement stmt : (Statement[])statements.toArray()) {
            if (stmt != null) try { stmt.close(); } catch (SQLException ex) {ex.printStackTrace();}
        }

        if (conn != null) try { conn.close(); } catch (SQLException ex) {ex.printStackTrace();}
   }

Is this a reasonable approach? Will this end up causing some kind of leak or problem? Thanks in advance, and please let me know if this belongs rather on codereview.se or somewhere else.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T11:56:58+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 11:56 am

    This is IMHO a bad idea for at least three reasons:

    1. Resources aren’t cleaned up immediately when they are no longer used. ResultSet is an expensive resource and I am not even sure whether you can have several opened result sets on one connection (update: you can, see comments).

    2. In this approach you are opening multiple resources at once, which might lead to excessive and unnecessary usage of database resources and peaks. Especially dangerous if the number of iterations is high.

    3. A special case of previous point is memory – if either Statement or ResultSet holds a lot of memory, holding an unnecessary reference to several such objects wil cause excessive memory usage.

    That being said consider using already built and safe utility classes like JdbcTemplate. I know it comes from Spring framework, but you can use it outside of the container (just pass an instance of DataSource) and never worry about closing JDBC resources again.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.