Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6167167
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T22:27:51+00:00 2026-05-23T22:27:51+00:00

So I’m writing a class that extends a dictionary which right now uses a

  • 0

So I’m writing a class that extends a dictionary which right now uses a method “dictify” to transform itself into a dict. What I would like to do instead though is change it so that calling dict() on the object results in the same behavior, but I don’t know which method to override. Is this not possible, or I am I missing something totally obvious? (And yes, I know the code below doesn’t work but I hope it illustrates what I’m trying to do.)

from collections import defaultdict

class RecursiveDict(defaultdict):
    '''
    A recursive default dict.

    >>> a = RecursiveDict()
    >>> a[1][2][3] = 4
    >>> a.dictify()
    {1: {2: {3: 4}}}
    '''
    def __init__(self):
        super(RecursiveDict, self).__init__(RecursiveDict)

    def dictify(self):
        '''Get a standard dictionary of the items in the tree.'''
        return dict([(k, (v.dictify() if isinstance(v, dict) else v))
                     for (k, v) in self.items()])

    def __dict__(self):
        '''Get a standard dictionary of the items in the tree.'''
        print [(k, v) for (k, v) in self.items()]
        return dict([(k, (dict(v) if isinstance(v, dict) else v))
                     for (k, v) in self.items()])

EDIT: To show the problem more clearly:

>>> b = RecursiveDict()
>>> b[1][2][3] = 4
>>> b
defaultdict(<class '__main__.RecursiveDict'>, {1: defaultdict(<class '__main__.RecursiveDict'>, {2: defaultdict(<class '__main__.RecursiveDict'>, {3: 4})})})
>>> dict(b)
{1: defaultdict(<class '__main__.RecursiveDict'>, {2: defaultdict(<class '__main__.RecursiveDict'>, {3: 4})})}
>>> b.dictify()
{1: {2: {3: 4}}}

I want dict(b) to be same as b.dictify()

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T22:27:52+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 10:27 pm

    Nothing wrong with your approach, but this is similar to the Autovivification feature of Perl, which has been implemented in Python in this question. Props to @nosklo for this.

    class RecursiveDict(dict):
        """Implementation of perl's autovivification feature."""
        def __getitem__(self, item):
            try:
                return dict.__getitem__(self, item)
            except KeyError:
                value = self[item] = type(self)()
                return value
    
    >>> a = RecursiveDict()
    >>> a[1][2][3] = 4
    >>> dict(a)
    {1: {2: {3: 4}}}
    

    EDIT

    As suggested by @Rosh Oxymoron, using __missing__ results in a more concise implementation. Requires Python >= 2.5

    class RecursiveDict(dict):
        """Implementation of perl's autovivification feature."""
        def __missing__(self, key):
            value = self[key] = type(self)()
            return value
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.