Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 814071
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T01:27:44+00:00 2026-05-15T01:27:44+00:00

So in jQuery, I have a global variable currentSubNav that stores a current visible

  • 0

So in jQuery, I have a global variable “currentSubNav” that stores a current visible element. The following code executes on “mouseenter”.

I need it to get store element’s ID, check to see if there was one. If there wasn’t, set the new visible element to the default.

$('#mainMenu a').mouseenter(function() {
    var newName = $(this).attr("id");
    if(newName == ''){
        var newName = "default";
    }

Then it checks to see if the new element matches the current one. If so, it returns. If not, it performs the animations to bring in the new one.

    if(newName == currentSubNav){
     return;
    }else{
     $("div[name=" + currentSubNav + "]").animate({"left": "+=600px", "opacity": "toggle"}, "slow");
     $("div[name=" + newName + "]").css({"margin-top": "0"});
     $("div[name=" + newName + "]").fadeIn(2000);
     $("div[name=" + currentSubNav + "]").animate({"left": "-=600px"}, 0);
     currentSubNav = newName;
     return;
    }
});

I’m using Chrome at the moment, and according to the dev tools that isn’t what happens.

Problem #1

“$(this).attr(“id”);” isn’t returning undefined as the documentation claims. It seems to be returning “”. BUT, when I have the if statement as I do above, it skips over the statement entirely. I set a breakpoint, but it never pauses execuation, so the statement is never evaluated.

Problem #2

After the animations occur, instead of using the return at the end of the statements it goes back and uses the return for the “newName == currentSubNav” if statement. I guess that not a big deal, but it’s not the intended behavior.

I’m fairly new to JavaScript, and it appears I’m missing something about how JavaScript works. But I can’t find what anywhere. Any help?

EDIT: It seems to be working in FireFox, (though jQuery isn’t returning undefined, it is returning ”). So this is a Chrome problem at the moment.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T01:27:45+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:27 am

    I would change the assignment of “newName” as follows:

    var newName = $(this).attr('id') || 'default';
    

    That’s more idiomatic, and it’ll handle cases where you’re getting null instead of an empty string, or vice-versa, and when it doesn’t really matter anyway.

    I suspect that some of the “problems” you’re seeing are more a matter of the Chrome debugger than the actual way that the code is running.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 410k
  • Answers 410k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Any idea what this code might be useful for -… May 15, 2026 at 7:24 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Both the template parameter and the function parameter have the… May 15, 2026 at 7:24 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer it is a simple templated class which wraps a native… May 15, 2026 at 7:23 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.