Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3346230
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T01:16:44+00:00 2026-05-18T01:16:44+00:00

So it appears that if you CAST(field1 as decimal) field1 this will automatically add

  • 0

So it appears that if you

CAST(field1 as decimal) field1

this will automatically add rounding.

The original is defined as:

field1 type:float length:8 prec:53

I need to cast it to decimal, because I need my Entity Framework layer to generate this field as decimal (instead of double).

Is there a way to cast it as decimal, so that it preserves original precision, and doesn’t round?

I would like to avoid having to declare the precision in the cast, because:

  1. there are 100’s of fields involved with varying precision, and;
  2. if the underlying table changes in the future, it could cause unforeseen bugs to emerge, and;
  3. makes the management more difficult.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T01:16:45+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 1:16 am

    Have you tried:

    SELECT Cast( 2.555 as decimal(53,8))
    

    This would return 2.55500000. Is that what you want?

    UPDATE:

    Apparently you can also use SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY to find the precision and scale of a value. Example:

    SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(Cast( 2.555 as decimal(8,7)),'Precision'),
    SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(Cast( 2.555 as decimal(8,7)),'Scale')
    

    returns 8|7

    You may be able to use this in your conversion process…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It appears that when you type in a number in Java, the compiler automatically
It appears that when I do git stash apply, I need to then type
It appears that add_to_class() https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/base.py#L218 doesn't actually add a column, but adds a field
It appears that we will have to build/deploy one of our new JBoss apps
It appears that calling Html.RenderAction in Asp.Net MVC2 apps can alter the mime type
So it appears that the .NET performance counter type has an annoying problem: it
Appears that WAS does not support the integration binding. I've tried setting it up
It appears that second windows are not closing. Here is what I am doing....
It appears that a lot of software, including low-level system calls, etc., relies on
It appears that NetBeans and Aptana/RadRails are the most common adopted IDE's for Ruby

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.