Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8027159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T23:43:55+00:00 2026-06-04T23:43:55+00:00

So it is my understanding that a C string of, for instance 0123456789, would

  • 0

So it is my understanding that a C string of, for instance “0123456789”, would actually occupy an array of 11 chars, 10 chars for the body and one for the terminating null. If that is true then why does the code below NOT cause some sort of error?

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(int argc, char ** argv){

    char * my_string = "0123456789";
    /* my string should occupy 11 bytes */

    int my_len = strlen(my_string);
    /* however, strlen should only return 10, 
        because it does not count the null byte */

    char * new_string = malloc(my_len);
    /* allocate memory 10 bytes wide */

    memcpy(new_string, my_string, my_len);
    /* copy the first 10 bytes from my_string to new_string
        new_string should NOT be null terminated if my understanding
        is correct? */

    printf("%s\n", new_string);

    /* Since new_stirng is NOT null terminated it seems like this should
        cause some sort of memory exception.
        WHY DOES THIS NOT CAUSE AN ERROR?

    */

    return 0;
}

Since new_string is not null terminated I would expect printf to just read forever until it reaches some other applications memory, or a randomly placed 0x00 somewhere and either crash or print something strange. What’s going on?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T23:43:57+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 11:43 pm

    You have created undefined behavior. The behavior is compiler and platform dependent. It could crash. It could work. It could make you toast. It could collapse your computer into a singularity and absorb the solar system.

    In your case, it’s likely that the memory at new_string[11] was already 0, which is '\0', or the terminating-null character.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My understanding is that literals are automatically interend. Let's take below code example. string
int main(void) { std::string foo(foo); } My understanding is that the above code uses
It's my understanding that all three of these lines below should return an ARRAY
It is my understanding that every time a class instance is created the instance
It's my understanding that in Spring, all objects are treated by default as singletons.
Understanding that I should probably just dig into the source to come up with
It is my understanding that a texture atlas is basically a single texture that
So it's my understanding that on a ReaderWriterLock (or ReaderWriterLockSlim more specifically), both the
It is my understanding that although Mercurial has support from branches, the community generally
It's my understanding that all .NET object instances begin with an 8 byte 'object

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.