Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6231693
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T09:58:48+00:00 2026-05-24T09:58:48+00:00

So lets say I have 3 objects Fruit, Apple and Orange. Fruit is the

  • 0

So lets say I have 3 objects Fruit, Apple and Orange. Fruit is the abstract base class for Apple and Orange. When I use session.Store(myApple), it puts it into the Apples collection. myOrange stores in the Oranges collection. Makes sense.

Can I tell Raven that I want a Fruits collection that could hold Apples or Oranges? Mongodb allows this since it lets me explicitly specify the collection name. The RavenDB collections documentation says:

The expected usage pattern is that collections are used to group
documents with similar structure, although that is not required. From
the database standpoint, a collection is just a group of documents
that share the same entity name.

I’d expect it to be something like: session.Store<Fruit>(myApple), or session.Store(“Fruits”, myApple)

Any ideas? Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T09:58:50+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:58 am

    Awl,
    You can do it using:

    session.Store(apple);
    session.Advanced.GetMetadataFor(apple)[Constants.RavenEntityName] = "Fruits";
    

    That is the long way to do so.
    A much better way would be to add this logic globally, it looks something like this:

    store.Conventions.FindTypeTagName = 
       type => type.IsSubclassOf(typeof(Fruit)) ? 
           DocumentConvention.DefaultTypeTagName(typeof(Fruit)) : 
           DocumentConvention.DefaultTypeTagName(type);
    

    That will handle this for everything.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two objects that are derived from same the base class. Lets say
lets's say I have: // all objects have valid mapping to database public class
Lets say I have the following code: public class Base { // Some stuff
Let's say we have a concrete class Apple . (Apple objects can be instantiated.)
Lets say I have two objects, and I want to use action script to
Lets say I have a base class and child like this: class BaseType {
Lets say we have two objects o1 & o2 defined as System.Object, in my
This is a contrived example, but lets say I have declared objects: CustomObj fooObj;
Lets say I have a million people objects that, when evaluated using person1.Matches(person2); return
Dumb question. Lets say I have a bunch of person objects with their fields

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.