Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3974588
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T04:35:08+00:00 2026-05-20T04:35:08+00:00

So maybe this is a dumb question and I’m over thinking this, but I

  • 0

So maybe this is a dumb question and I’m over thinking this, but I have the following situation. I am making a “class Shell” which can run abstract “class Action” objects. It is the only class that should create or use these objects. Action objects need access to the Shell to perform specific actions on it, but I’m trying to avoid adding public interfaces for this (no one else should be allowed to do that).

I originally had a simple (not so elegant)

class Shell
{
 public:
    bool checkThing();
    // etc...
 private:
    bool _thing;
};

class Action
{
 public:
    virtual void execute( Shell &s )=0;
};

class ChangeAction : public Action
{
 public:
    void execute( Shell &s )
    {
        // requires friendship or public mutator!
        s._thing = true;
    }
};

So I considered a nested class Action, but I wanted to make it private (why let anyone else make concrete Actions except the Shell, right?)

class Shell
{
 public:
    bool checkThing();
    // etc...
 private:
    bool _thing;
    class Action;
};

class Shell::Action
{
 public:
    virtual void execute( Shell &s )=0;
};

class ChangeAction : public Shell::Action
{
 public:
    void execute( Shell &s )
    {
        // ok now!
        s._thing = true;
    }
};

But of course I can’t inherit from Action any more (that makes sense, it’s private). So that doesn’t work.

So my question, should I just go with the first method and friendship or a public interface? Can I use something similar to the second method to keep that relationship with Actions and the Shell?
Do you have a better idea?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T04:35:08+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 4:35 am

    If the only code that needs to be able to see Action is Shell, one option would be to forward-declare Action in the header file but only define the class in the .cpp file. This would then let you declare as many Action subclasses as you’d like in the implementation file without letting anyone else subclass off of Action because no one else would have a complete class definition for Action. This also avoids any need for public interfaces or friend declarations – all the Action classes are declared in the global scope, but shielded from other files by virtue of being declared in the .cpp file.

    Great question, by the way!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.