Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3304366
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T21:03:16+00:00 2026-05-17T21:03:16+00:00

So with Firesheep , everyone in a public Wi-Fi now has a one-click session

  • 0

So with Firesheep, everyone in a public Wi-Fi now has a one-click session hijack tool.

The way it works – to my understanding – is that it simply captures all traffic and grabs the session cookie (so it doesn’t steal passwords).

From my understanding, this also means that a HTTPS secured login does not solve this alone, as further HTTP traffic would include the Session Cookie in clear text again.

Tying the session to a specific IP address is useless thanks to NAT, and tying it to the user agent is easy to spoof.

So is 100% HTTPS at all times the only way to prevent this type of session hijacking? Couldn’t people simply sniff the entire HTTPS Traffic including the handshake, or is this stuff safe? (I’m thinking of replay attacks, but have no knowledge in that area.)

Of course, not using public/open Wi-Fi Networks is the better choice, but I’m still interested what a website developer can do to protect his/her users.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T21:03:17+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 9:03 pm

    Firesheep is nothing new. Session hijacking has been around for as long as web applications have been using Session IDs. Usually hackers just set their own cookie by typing this into the address bar: javascript:document.cookie='SOME_COOKIE'. This tool is for script kiddies that fear 1 line of JavaScript.

    Cookies can be hijacked if you don’t use HTTPS for the entire life of the session and this is a part of OWASP A9 – Insufficient Transport Layer Protection. But you can also hijack a session with XSS.

    1) Use httponly cookies.

    2) Use “secure cookies” (Horrible name, but it’s a flag that forces the browser to make the cookie HTTPS only.)

    3) Scan your web application for XSS.

    Also don’t forget about CSRF! (Which Firesheep doesn’t address.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Facebook has done great work on preventing eavesdropping (with tools like Firesheep) by supporting
Session cookies are quickly becoming a standard way of doing login management. However, if
My understanding of token based authentication is that upon authentication (perhaps over ssl), a
I'm trying to move one list item from one side to another. However, it
I presume there is a bug in the firesheep which fireshepard exploits. The responsible
I'm having problems building this; has anyone got any ideas as to where to
What methodologies do people recommend for mitigating the 'Firesheep' method for website applications? We
Regarding this security issue: http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/24/firesheep-in-wolves-clothing-app-lets-you-hack-into-twitter-facebook-accounts-easily/ Is it true to say any time a user
I have the impression that ASP.NET Membership encrypts its cookie by default. Is it
i have followed the answer to this thread C# import excel filesheet to sql

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.