Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6557577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T13:05:29+00:00 2026-05-25T13:05:29+00:00

So, with nolock will not take any locks. Will it still honor outstanding locks?

  • 0

So, with nolock will not take any locks. Will it still honor outstanding locks? For example, if I attempt to select a row with nolock, which another process has put an exclusive lock on, will my select with nolock be blocked, or will it select the row?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T13:05:30+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 1:05 pm

    I think the use of “NOLOCK” results in a dirty read which means that the data which is present before some locking has happened. Suppose, if a write lock has been put on a table to update some data and we try to read the data using “NOLOCK”, the data which is present before updating is returned to us.

    Hope this helps!!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it safe to use MS SQL's WITH (NOLOCK) option for select statements and
I have a stored procedure which selects a single field from a single row
I have the following query: select count(ords.TRACKING_NUM) from Orders ords (NoLock) group by ords.TRACKING_NUM
I will preface this question by saying, I do not think it is solvable.
I have CTEs which all uses NOLOCK inside. But then selects from those CTEs
I have seen developers using WITH(nolock) in the query, is there any disadvantage of
I have a process with a Select which takes a long time to finish,
Short: SQL statement in my C# code is not working. with(nolock) is breaking the
select max(Key) from MyTable with(nolock) I have this T-SQL statement but need to use
My understanding is that when NOLOCK is used in SELECT statement, it could read

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.