Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 134195
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T06:34:11+00:00 2026-05-11T06:34:11+00:00

Some commands in Solaris (such as iostat) report disk related information using disk names

  • 0

Some commands in Solaris (such as iostat) report disk related information using disk names such as sd0 or sdd2. Is there a consistent way to map these names back to the standard /dev/dsk/c?t?d?s? disk names in Solaris?

Edit: As Amit points out, iostat -n produces device names such as eg c0t0d0s0 instead of sd0. But how do I found out that sd0 actually is c0t0d0s0? I’m looking for something that produces a list like this:

 sd0=/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 ... sdd2=/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s4 ... 

Maybe I could run iostat twice (with and without -n) and then join up the results and hope that the number of lines and device sorting produced by iostat is identical between the two runs?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T06:34:11+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:34 am

    Following Amit’s idea to answer my own question, this is what I have come up with:

    iostat -x|tail -n +3|awk '{print $1}'>/tmp/f0.txt.$$ iostat -nx|tail -n +3|awk '{print '/dev/dsk/'$11}'>/tmp/f1.txt.$$ paste -d= /tmp/f[01].txt.$$ rm /tmp/f[01].txt.$$ 

    Running this on a Solaris 10 server gives the following output:

    sd0=/dev/dsk/c0t0d0 sd1=/dev/dsk/c0t1d0 sd4=/dev/dsk/c0t4d0 sd6=/dev/dsk/c0t6d0 sd15=/dev/dsk/c1t0d0 sd16=/dev/dsk/c1t1d0 sd21=/dev/dsk/c1t6d0 ssd0=/dev/dsk/c2t1d0 ssd1=/dev/dsk/c3t5d0 ssd3=/dev/dsk/c3t6d0 ssd4=/dev/dsk/c3t22d0 ssd5=/dev/dsk/c3t20d0 ssd7=/dev/dsk/c3t21d0 ssd8=/dev/dsk/c3t2d0 ssd18=/dev/dsk/c3t3d0 ssd19=/dev/dsk/c3t4d0 ssd28=/dev/dsk/c3t0d0 ssd29=/dev/dsk/c3t18d0 ssd30=/dev/dsk/c3t17d0 ssd32=/dev/dsk/c3t16d0 ssd33=/dev/dsk/c3t19d0 ssd34=/dev/dsk/c3t1d0 

    The solution is not very elegant (it’s not a one-liner), but it seems to work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 124k
  • Answers 124k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you running on OS 3.0? I saw the same… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like you need to register Apache::Session::Memcached with Apache::Session::Wrapper,… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use DATENAME or DATEPART: SELECT DATENAME(dw,GETDATE()) -- Friday SELECT DATEPART(dw,GETDATE())… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am

Related Questions

Mostly for my amusement, I created a makefile in my $HOME/bin directory called rebuild.mk
I have been using git to keep two copies of my project in sync,
I have some applications, and standard Unix tools sending their output to named-pipes in
We have some applications that sometimes get into a bad state, but only in

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.