Some insights into the decision would be appreciated. I have a hard time finding the reasons why this is specified in the CSS design.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Some insights into the decision would be appreciated. I have a hard time finding the reasons why this is specified in the CSS design.
I suspect they already foresaw the need to have other background images than URL-based ones.
linear-gradientfor instance.Also, since image files do not have to have a file name extension, it would be difficult to distinguish the image file from the other properties in the
backgroundshorthand method