Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6053187
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T08:00:42+00:00 2026-05-23T08:00:42+00:00

Some methods, such as auto-generated getters, setters, equals and toString, are trivial for test.

  • 0

Some methods, such as auto-generated getters, setters, equals and toString, are trivial for test. However, if they aren’t added into the testing classes, the code coverage percentage (calculated using Emma) is reduced and may crash our system build.

How can I force emma to ignore these methods in the code coverage percentage?

Regards,

Felipe

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T08:00:43+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:00 am

    From the EMMA FAQ:

    A feature to allow EMMA users to mark arbitrary methods as excluded from
    coverage is being considered for future versions.

    So unfortunately this doesn’t seem to be possible at the moment. There’s an open feature request for this in EMMA’s tracker.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've found myself writing some repetitious code in C++. I'm using some auto-generated, such
We have some methods that call File.Copy, File.Delete, File.Exists, etc. How can we test
I need some JS class or CSS method to create from any text such
What are some methods of utilising Eclipse for Dependency Management?
I need to write some methods for loading/saving some classes to and from a
I'm currently writing some methods that do some basic operations on form controls eg
I've seen some methods of checking if a PEFile is a .NET assembly by
I have some methods that are used by several classes. My idea was to
I need to call some methods in Wininet.dll from a Java program. I can
In a classes are some methods that are run synchronously. I would like them

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.