Some system libraries like malloc strlen want or return size_t as parameter.
- What is the right choice in LLVM IR to interact with these functions?
- Is the selection the task for the compiler?
- Does LLVM IR have a size_t type?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
At the LLVM level, size_t doesn’t exist. It is a construct for the benefit of the developer that is typedef’d to a native type. The native types have a fixed size for the target architecture and that is how the compiler represents them in LLVM bit code. So on x86, size_t might by viewed by the front end as unsigned long, which it then writes to LLVM as i32 (since LLVM assembly doesn’t have an unsigned type).