Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 726677
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:28:45+00:00 2026-05-14T06:28:45+00:00

some times i see that functions are defined as below: read_dir(dir) char *dir; {

  • 0

some times i see that functions are defined as below:

read_dir(dir)
char    *dir;   
{
        DIR * dirp;
        struct dirent *d;

        /* open directory */
        dirp = opendir(dir);
  ......... so  on

here what is the importance of the statement

char    *dir;

what is the intension behind declaring the pointer soon after the function name and then starting the function body.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:28:46+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:28 am

    It’s an older C syntax, kalled “K&R C” since it’s how it appeared in the original version of the legendary book.

    What used to be written like this:

    foo(a, b)
    int a;
    int b;
    {
    }
    

    is now

    int foo(int a, int b)
    {
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I see this all the time: object literals declared such that some keys are
I see that when connecting services to twitter/facebook, sometimes apps are storing the user
I see on sites that they sometimes have a statistic showing how many views
Sometime I see many application such as msn, windows media player etc that are
I've spent some time casually mulling over ACLs in my head. I can see
I was overlooking some code that I had written to generate an A-Z navigation
I have a series of functions that are all designed to do the same
I have some jQuery with an Ajax call that looks like this: $.ajax({ type:
Below you can see my .xaml.cs code. The app opens fine. There are 4
I sometimes see that change I made shows up on third or 4th build

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.