Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6792837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T18:01:22+00:00 2026-05-26T18:01:22+00:00

Sometimes procedural programming is absolutely unavoidable when processing data. I am currently working on

  • 0

Sometimes procedural programming is absolutely unavoidable when processing data.

I am currently working on optimizing some legacy code. It uses a cursor, 63 pairs of IF/ELSE statements and BEGIN/END‘s etc. I had hoped to reverse engineer the cursor and make it a procedural process. Now I’m at the end of decoding the algorithm and I realize . . . ooops…it has to be procedural because each choice made on a record depends on the outcome of the process on all the preceding records.

So now I’m torn…there are other choices for mixing procedural code in with SQL Server processing (CLR SPs, UDF’s etc.). I’m a big believer in using the right tool for the job, so I’m leaning towards making a .NET CLR SP for this. But it would be faster and “easier” to just simplify the cursor a bit, but still keep the cursor.

What do you all think? Now that we have .NET modules accessible from withing SQL Server, is it ever appropriate anymore to use cursors (which in my opion were a kludge/work around to begin with).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T18:01:23+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:01 pm

    With SQL server at least, whih has both session nd global temporary tables and table variables, I can not envision a scenario where I would choose to use a server-side cursor. Not all code can be set-based, as you’ve discovered with yuor legacy app (Are you sure there’s no alternative?) but even of you have to iterate through records procedurally, a cursor is the worst choice available.

    using a table variable, for e.g.,
    (And this approach starts to degrade in performance for very large table sets)

     Declare @Pks Table (pk integer primary key not null)
     Insert @pks(pk)
     Select pkcolName from table where ... [here put logic to 
               extract id values for rows you need to iterate over
    
     -- then put procedural code here ...
     Declare @pk Integer
     While Exists (Select * From @pks) Begin
         Select @pk = Max(pk) From @pks -- assuming you need to work 
                                 -- on pk values from highest to lowest
         // Here do work on one record at a time, using value in @pk
         Delete @pks Where pk = @pk
     End
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Sometimes I still get stuck trying to translate procedural code into functional code. Is
Sometimes I need to quickly extract some arbitrary data from XML files to put
Sometimes I have to work on code that moves the computer clock forward. In
Sometimes a labeled break or continue can make code a lot more readable. OUTERLOOP:
I have this stored procedure, that reads data from xml and make some inserts
When programming in c++ STL, or intensively using 'templatization', and some compiling error happens,
Is there something wrong with this code? Sometimes I get an unhandled Invalid transaction
sometimes i'm using OO des. and sometimes procedural style and everytime i use oop
EDIT: Sometimes it happens that our problem is kind of not in code but
when I use some nested if / else statements, sometimes I get confused if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.