Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 35503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:14:46+00:00 2026-05-10T14:14:46+00:00

Specifically, is the following legal C++? class A{}; void foo(A*); void bar(const A&); int

  • 0

Specifically, is the following legal C++?

class A{};  void foo(A*); void bar(const A&);  int main(void) {     foo(&A());  // 1     bar(A());  // 2 }

It appears to work correctly, but that doesn’t mean it’s necessarily legal. Is it?

Edit – changed A& to const A&

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:14:47+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    1: Taking the address of a temporary is not allowed. Visual C++ allows it as a language extension (language extensions are on by default).

    2: This is perfectly legal.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

More specifically, I have (simplified) the following: union foo { volatile int bits; char
Consider the following example: // does not work foo( func_num_args() ); // works $args
I am interested in the following scenario specifically. Suppose you have team that writes
I'm following the sample code in CFNetwork Programming Guide , specifically the section on
What are the priority order of the following preferences in wiki specifically twiki or
I'm trying to figure out what the following line does exactly - specifically the
I've been reading through the Linux kernel (specifically, 2.6.11). I came across the following
Is there a language agnostic algorithm to name tuples? Specifically, I want the following
Specifically in .NET, but I'm leaving it open.
I am looking at the iPhone aurioTouch example specifically on the following code: static

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.