Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 707049
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T04:14:02+00:00 2026-05-14T04:14:02+00:00

SQL Server 2005 x64 on Windows Server 2003 x64, with multiple instances (default +

  • 0

SQL Server 2005 x64 on Windows Server 2003 x64, with multiple instances (default + 2 named). Engineers moved server to a different domain. Since then, cannot get SQLBrowser to start. Still able to query the default instance, and can access named instances by port (TCP:hostname,port#). When on server, can use SSMS to connect to the instances, all is well from that perspective. No errors in the SQL Server logs.

As SQLBrowser is starting, an entry in EventViewer.Application says that one of the named instances has an invalid configuration, but I haven’t been able to figure out what is invalid. Startup continues, and next message says “The SQLBrowser service was unable to establish SQL instance and connectivity discovery.” Next, it enables instance and connectivity discovery support; next, another message about that same named instance having an invalid configuration; then an event says that SQLBrowser has started; last, an event shows the SQLBrowser service has shutdown.

I got SQLBrowser to get past the issue with the first named instance by temporarily renaming a registry entry, and now the second named instance can be accessed by name rather than port. Still, cannot access the first named instance by name.

Advice?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T04:14:02+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:14 am

    The problem turned out to be some old keys left behind by uninstalls of a few instances of 2000. Microsoft walked me through removing the keys, and SQLBrowser fired right up.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 534k
  • Answers 534k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No matter how you put your password into your binary,… May 17, 2026 at 12:45 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Edit: Got rid or the MAX() OVER (PARTITION BY ...)… May 17, 2026 at 12:44 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer and a third join LEFT JOIN votes AS `VotePerUser` ON… May 17, 2026 at 12:44 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I'm running Windows Server 2003 x64 with 8GB RAM and SQL Server 2005 64
So I got a 64 bit virtual machine running x64 Windows Server 2003 Standard
SQL Server 2005 SP3 on Windows Server 2008 R2. I ran a server side
I am maintaining a classic ASP website that has a SQL Server 2005 backend.
SQL Server 2005 BOL says about BREAK: Exits the innermost loop in a WHILE
In SQL Server 2005, is it possible to automatically set transaction isolation level to,
In sql server 2005, the autogrowth is enabled by size. Is there any way
I'm using Microsoft SQL Server 2005, and am relatively new to SQL in general.
I connect to an SQL Server 2005 DB from SAS 9.2 via SAS/Access ODBC
I am working on SQL Server 2005. I have took the backup and restore

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.