Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3278448
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T19:28:56+00:00 2026-05-17T19:28:56+00:00

Straight to the point: I’ve got two singleton classes, both inheriting their singleton nature

  • 0

Straight to the point:
I’ve got two singleton classes, both inheriting their singleton nature from a super-class. I initialize some properties on the first singleton, and then have the second singleton retrieve the instance of the first one. That instance, however, does not seem to be the one I initialized in the first place. Some example code might help to explain this:

First, the super-class, providing singleton nature (requires PHP 5.3 or greater):

class Singleton {

    protected static $instance;

    protected function __construct() { }

    final private function __clone() { }

    public static function getInstance() {
        if (!(static::$instance instanceof static)) {
            static::$instance = new static();
        }
        return static::$instance;
    }

}

Then we’ve got the the first singleton carrying a value:

require_once('Singleton.php');

class SingletonA extends Singleton {

    protected $value;

    public function SingletonA() {
        $this->value = false;
    }

    public function getValue() {
        return $this->value;
    }

    public function setValue($value) {
        $this->value = $value;
    }

}

Then the second singleton that references the first singleton:

require_once('Singleton.php');
require_once('SingletonA.php');

class SingletonB extends Singleton {

    public function getValue() {
        return SingletonA::getInstance()->getValue();
    }

}

Now for the test that shows how this fails:

require_once('SingletonA.php');
require_once('SingletonB.php');

SingletonA::getInstance()->setValue(true);

echo (SingletonA::getInstance()->getValue()) ? "true\n" : "false\n";
echo (SingletonB::getInstance()->getValue()) ? "true\n" : "false\n";

The test yields the following output:

true
false

Clearly, the SingletonA instance that the test code references is not the same instance that the SingletonB instance references. In short, SingletonA is not as single as I need it to be. How is this possible? And what magic can I wield to remedy this behaviour, giving me a true singleton?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T19:28:57+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:28 pm

    Try using isset rather than instanceof:

    class Singleton {
        protected static $instances;
    
        protected function __construct() { }
    
        final private function __clone() { }
    
        public static function getInstance() {
            $class = get_called_class();
    
            if (!isset(self::$instances[$class])) {
                self::$instances[$class] = new $class;
            }
            return self::$instances[$class];
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm doing some straight up asynchronous calls from javascript using the XMLHTTPRequest object. On
I'm admittedly a straight-C newbie, but this has got me stumped. I'm working on
Straight to the point: Where can I place the algoritm for password hash encryption
Straight to the point: I have this javascript: for(item=1;item<5;item++) { xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); xmlhttp.open(GET,'zzz.php', true);
I'll get straight to the point. I'm building a website on an existing database,
OK - I'll get straight to the point - here's the PHP code in
The question wasn't clear enough, I think; here's an updated straight to the point
I'll get straight to the point, I am using jQuery to clone a div
I'm not sure if I got my terms straight here, but I was wondering:
Summarization: Calculations point out in a straight-forward way that: A .BMP picture of 3289

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.