Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 948311
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:13:27+00:00 2026-05-15T23:13:27+00:00

Strange problem occurred when I tried to solve usual diamond problem in a usual

  • 0

Strange problem occurred when I tried to “solve” usual diamond problem in a usual way – using virtual inheritance:

  A
 / \* both virtual
B   C
 \ /
  D

However my base class A doesn’t have default constructor, so I was to call it manually from D. However when I try to add a class E into this diamond as C-inherited

  A
 / \* both virtual
B   C
 \ / \
  D   E

it is still needed to call constructor of A in E constructor manually, i.e. C doesn’t what to create A from E even though there is neither multiple inheritance nor diamond A-C-E.

class A                     
   {public: 
      A (int _N): N(_N) {};
      void show()
        {cout<<"A"<<N;} 
    protected:
      int N;
   }; 
class B: public virtual A   
   { public: 
       B(int n): A(2*n) {};
       void show()
        { cout<<"B"<<N;} 
   }; 
class C: public virtual A   
   { public: 
       C(int n): A(3*n) {};
       void show()
        { cout<<"C"<<N;} 
   }; 
class D: public B,C 
   { public: 
       D(): B(1), C(2), A(3) {};
       void show()
        { cout<<"D"<<N;} 
   }; 

class E: public virtual C
   { public:
       E(): C(1) {};
       void show()
        { cout<<"E"<<N;} 
   }; 

int main()
  {D d;       // OK
   A *a = &d; 
   a->show(); 

   E e;        // NOT OK, no function A::A() to call in E::E()
   A *a2 = &e;
   a2->show();
   return 0;
  } 

Is it possible to solve this issue without calling constructor of A from E? I need C to do it properly :-).

Or is it possible not to try to solve diamond problem at all:

A   A
|   |  no virtual at all
B   C
 \ / \
  D   E

and still try to declare object of class D with two instances of A but telling compiler to use A of C when colling from D each time? When I try to add

using C::A

into the declaration of D it still produce error of unambiguous base A.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:13:28+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:13 pm

    Is it possible to solve this issue without calling constructor of A from E? I need C to do it properly :-).

    The constructor for the most derived class (in this case, E) is responsible for calling the constructor for any virtual base classes.

    The constructor of C cannot call the constructor of A because C is not the most derived class. Virtual base classes are initialized before any direct base classes, so E must initialize by A before it can initialize C.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.