Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5950371
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T17:23:02+00:00 2026-05-22T17:23:02+00:00

struct A { A(int a); }; struct B { B(); void b(std::shared_ptr<A> a); };

  • 0
struct A
{
    A(int a);
};

struct B
{
    B();
    void b(std::shared_ptr<A> a);
};

int main()
{
    A a(1);
    B b;
    b.b(&a);
}

So I got this error, sorry guys it’s my frist time with the smart pointers!!

Error:

no suitable constructor exists to convert from "A *" to "std::tr1::shared_ptr<A>"

How do I fix this problem!?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T17:23:03+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 5:23 pm

    Others already ranted on the design error of your code, but not the real problem why the code doesn’t even compile. shared_ptr has a constructor that accepts a raw pointer, but it is marked as explicit, which means you have to explicitly write out that you want to construct a shared_ptr instance. What your function call tries, is to do that construction implicitly, which isn’t allowed because of the explicit keyword.

    The following will compile but give undefined behaviour because the shared_ptr will (try to) delete an object which resides on the stack and is as such not deleteable:

    b.b(shared_ptr<A>(&a)); // explicit construction
    

    A special trait of shared_ptr is that you can pass the constructor a deleter, which will be called when the owned pointer should be deleted. You can just write and use a “noop” deleter, which does just nothing; the following will not invoke undefined behaviour and will not try to delete the stack variable:

    // outside of main
    void noop_deleter(A*){/*do nothing*/}
    
     // call...
    b.b(shared_ptr<A>(&a, noop_deleter));
    

    And there actually is a use for this, if you have a library API that absolutely wants a shared_ptr but you want to call it with a stack variable. The design of that API is another thing though…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a struct like this: struct A { void i(int i) {} void
Consider something like: struct Parameter { int a; Parameter(){a = 0;} void setA(int newA){a
void addNewNode (struct node *head, int n) { struct node* temp = (struct node*)
struct TimerEvent { event Event; timeval TimeOut; static void HandleTimer(int Fd, short Event, void
I am curious why this code works: typedef struct test_struct { int id; }
Let's say I have a first structure like this: typedef struct { int ivalue;
struct elem { int i; char k; }; elem user; // compile error! struct
struct Div { int i; int j; }; class A { public: A(); Div&
Testing the following in D import std.stdio; struct S { int _val; @property ref
I've got a compile-time recursive type that looks somewhat like this: template <typename DataType,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.