Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8087043
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T18:38:52+00:00 2026-06-05T18:38:52+00:00

struct pointsto_val_def { unsigned int lhs; bitmap rhs; struct pointsto_val_def *next; }; typedef struct

  • 0
struct pointsto_val_def
{
    unsigned int lhs;
    bitmap rhs;
    struct pointsto_val_def *next;
};
typedef struct pointsto_val_def *pointsto_val;

typedef pointsto_val *pointsto_val_hash;

Can the last two statements be simply replaced by this one statement?

typedef struct pointsto_val_def *pointsto_val_hash

Thanks in advance. Cheers.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T18:38:54+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 6:38 pm

    I think the answer is no.Because the type of pointsto_val_hash is struct pointsto_val_def**, that means pointsto_val_hash is a pointer which is pointed to struct pointsto_val_def*.And your replacement means a pointer which is pointed to struct pointsto_val_def, they are not the same.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

struct node{ int data; struct node * next; }; How does the compiler allocate
I have a dictionary that goes like this: typedef struct dictNode { int key;
I want to do something like this. typedef struct Test{ int value; struct Test*
struct Foo { Foo(int i) { ptr = new int(i); } ~Foo() { delete
struct X{}; template<class T> decltype(X() == int()) f(T const&){ return true; } int main(void)
struct { char a; int b; } x; Why would one define a struct
struct SomeStruct { int a; int b; }; SomeStruct someFn( int init ) {
struct Div { int i; int j; }; class A { public: A(); Div&
struct struct0 { int a; }; struct struct1 { struct struct0 structure0; int b;
I've got a following struct struct teststruct { int *a; void *data; }; Is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.