Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6907397
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T08:25:46+00:00 2026-05-27T08:25:46+00:00

StructureMap defines an interface IBootStrapper, that I see a number of people implementing in

  • 0

StructureMap defines an interface IBootStrapper, that I see a number of people implementing in their bootstrapper classes.

But I can’t find anything that gives some indication as to why you should implement this interface. What does one gain by doing so?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T08:25:47+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:25 am

    It is simply a convention that allows tooling (like StructureMapDoctor) to discover your bootstrapping code. It is purely optional, and not required by StructureMap itself.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

High Level With StructureMap, Can I define a assembly scan rule that for an
Possible Duplicate: StructureMap singleton usage (A class implementing two interface) I'm currently designing a
With StructureMap, I know that you can wire constructor arguments to app settings when
I have a structuremap configuration that has me scratching my head. I have a
In Using StructureMap 2.5 to scan all assemblies in a folder , we can
I'm using StructureMap 2.6.1 This is the code from Bootstrapper.cs: ObjectFactory.Initialize(x => x.For<IFoo>().Use<Foo>()); When
I have a base controller which is defined as follows, but the constructor that
I'm implementing StructureMap in a multi-tenant ASP.NET MVC application to inject instances of my
I'm using StructureMap for my DI. Imagine I have a class that takes 1
Say I have an event defined in an interface. I then have many classes

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.