Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 155155
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T10:06:20+00:00 2026-05-11T10:06:20+00:00

stupid question but this statement is worthless int a; if (a != null) since

  • 0

stupid question but this statement is worthless

int a;  if (a != null) 

since an integer var is automatically set to null by the compiler when defined

to check integers always check if a >= 0 correct?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T10:06:20+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:06 am

    The compiler sets the value of a primitive variable to its ‘default’ value if you don’t assign it. The default value of int is 0. So yeah, the comparison you mention doesn’t really do anything.

    If you need a nullable int in your code you should use the ‘nullable’ type ‘int?’.

    If your int is nullable, then the comparison you mention might be useful.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This might be a stupid question but if there's a better or proper way
This might be a stupid question but I just wanted to make sure... If
This is likely a stupid question but I always find myself wondering which is
This might be a stupid question but I'm new at all this. I want
This may be a stupid question but im just starting to learn Rail thats
This might be a stupid question but I'll ask anyway, I was reading OOP
I have a feeling this is a stupid question but I can't find the
This is a quick (and probably stupid) question but if I have two consts
This may sound like a stupid question but I'm a beginner not just to
This question is for a web application. And maybe it's a stupid question but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.