Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8750879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T12:56:36+00:00 2026-06-13T12:56:36+00:00

Suppose a function that create a class and return: Foo getFoo () { return

  • 0

Suppose a function that create a class and return:

Foo getFoo ()
{
   return Foo ("bar");
}

And second method:

Foo getFoo ()
{
   Foo foo ("bar");
   return foo;
}

Now I call it with const Foo & myFoo = getFoo()

Is the first method more efficient? They looked same to me, since they both create a temp variable and returns it, am I wrong?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T12:56:37+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 12:56 pm

    They’re basically the same, although copy elision in the first one would be called ‘return value optimization’ (RVO) while in the second it would be ‘named return value optimization’ (NRVO). At one point there were compilers that could do RVO but not NRVO.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose that I have two data types Foo and Bar. Foo has fields x
Suppose I create a custom object/javascript class (airquotes) as follows: // Constructor function CustomObject(stringParam)
What i know: actionformbean that we create is a sub class of ActionForm Now
Suppose I'm writing a function that takes a list of integers and returns only
Suppose I have a function that returns a closure: sub generator { my $resource
Suppose that you have a function f: List a -> a such that f
Suppose that my Haskell function is given an input, which is supposed to be
Suppose that in the main I have a function a : a(c); and c
For logging and reporting reasons I create objects that have the class name and
Suppose I have simple class like: class MyClass { private $_prop; public function getProp()

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.