Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7566313
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T14:22:50+00:00 2026-05-30T14:22:50+00:00

Suppose A is some square matrix. How can I easily exponentiate this matrix in

  • 0

Suppose A is some square matrix. How can I easily exponentiate this matrix in R?

I tried two ways already: Trial 1 with a for-loop hack and Trial 2 a bit more elegantly but it is still a far cry from Ak simplicity.

Trial 1

set.seed(10)
t(matrix(rnorm(16),ncol=4,nrow=4)) -> a 
for(i in 1:2){a <- a %*% a}

Trial 2

a <- t(matrix(c(0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0),nrow=4))
i <- diag(4) 
(function(n) {if (n<=1) a else (i+a) %*% Recall(n-1)})(10)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T14:22:52+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 2:22 pm

    Although Reduce is more elegant, a for-loop solution is faster and seems to be as fast as expm::%^%

    m1 <- matrix(1:9, 3)
    m2 <- matrix(1:9, 3)
    m3 <- matrix(1:9, 3)
    system.time(replicate(1000, Reduce("%*%" , list(m1,m1,m1) ) ) )
    #   user  system elapsed 
    #  0.026   0.000   0.037 
    mlist <- list(m1,m2,m3)
    m0 <- diag(1, nrow=3,ncol=3)
    system.time(replicate(1000, for (i in 1:3 ) {m0 <- m0 %*% m1 } ) )
    #   user  system elapsed 
    #  0.013   0.000   0.014 
    
    library(expm)  # and I think this may be imported with pkg:Matrix
    system.time(replicate(1000, m0%^%3))
    # user  system elapsed 
    #0.011   0.000   0.017 
    

    On the other hand the matrix.power solution is much, much slower:

    system.time(replicate(1000, matrix.power(m1, 4)) )
       user  system elapsed 
      0.677   0.013   1.037 
    

    @BenBolker is correct (yet again). The for-loop appears linear in time as the exponent rises whereas the expm::%^% function appears to be even better than log(exponent).

    > m0 <- diag(1, nrow=3,ncol=3)
    > system.time(replicate(1000, for (i in 1:400 ) {m0 <- m0 %*% m1 } ) )
       user  system elapsed 
      0.678   0.037   0.708 
    > system.time(replicate(1000, m0%^%400))
       user  system elapsed 
      0.006   0.000   0.006 
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I suppose in some ways either (or both) Delegate or MethodInfo qualify for this
Suppose I have some XAML like this: <Window.Resources> <v:MyClass x:Key=whatever Text=foo\nbar /> </Window.Resources> Obviously
Suppose some callback is registered for stdin . fileevent stdin readable thatCallback This means
Suppose some memory location 0xF0000 contains four character string four . so is this
Suppose some Haskell file is executed with runghc Queens.hs gecode_compile Now, this fails, and
Suppose some Windows service uses code that wants mapped network drives and no UNC
I have a custom event handler, or I suppose some call it a custom
Suppose I have some code that would, in theory, compile against any version of
Suppose we have some named enums: enum MyEnum { FOO, BAR = 0x50 };
Suppose I have some code: let listB = [ 1; 2; 3 ] Using

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.