Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6928935
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T11:15:13+00:00 2026-05-27T11:15:13+00:00

Suppose I have a class called Person: public class Person { private String name,

  • 0

Suppose I have a class called Person:

public class Person 
{
    private String name, ID, location;
}

Instead of writing individual accessors for name, ID, and location, is there anyway to do something like this:

public String get%s 
{
    return this.%s
}

Where “%s” stands as a sort of place holder for the name of the String which I want to “get”. This way, for the sake of convenience and efficiency, I will be able to write one method to access all three Strings. Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T11:15:14+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 11:15 am

    Java doesn’t have this feature, but if you use Eclipse, you can automatically generate setters and getters for your class members.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have a class public class MyClass { private Set<String> set = new
Suppose you have this class: public class A { private int number; public setNumber(int
Suppose I have an XML-serializable class called Song : [Serializable] class Song { public
Suppose I have a class with a private property and associated public getter and
Suppose that we have a class called class1. The class1 has a method called
Suppose I have class Foo(db.Model): bar = db.ReferenceProperty(Bar) foo = Foo.all().get() Is there a
Suppose I have: class Foo { ... }; class Bar : public Foo {
Suppose I have class A { public: void print(){cout<<A; }}; class B: public A
Suppose I have: public class foobar { public int lorem; public int ipsum; }
Suppose we have a class called AccountService that manages the state of accounts. AccountService

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.