Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3228880
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:44:42+00:00 2026-05-17T16:44:42+00:00

suppose I have a class defined as follows class foo { char [10] bar;

  • 0

suppose I have a class defined as follows

class foo
{
    char [10] bar;
}

How would the size of this class differ when in a 64 bit environment compared to a 32 bit one, assuming no padding/packing.

I believe the 64 bit version of the class would be 4 more bytes in length since:

  1. The class must contain a char* in order to point to the start of the array bar
  2. an char* is 8 bytes in a 64 bit environment vs 4 bytes in a 32 bit environment

Am I correct?

Thanks!

A further question about how arrays actually work
If there is no pointer stored when you declare an array, how come you can get an address out of the array name and do things like bar[0], bar[1], etc?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:44:43+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:44 pm

    No you are not. char [] bar; won’t even compile, char bar[10]; is the correct syntax, and no, no pointer is stored, sizeof(char) is always 1 and sizeof bar will be 10, regardless of the architecture.

    Now for your additional question:
    You must understand the notion of lvalues and rvalues and lvalue-to-rvalue conversions. Usually lvalue-to-rvalue conversions “do nothing”. An excetion is that an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion for array of T is conversion to a pointer to T which points to the first element of the array.

    Also a function declaration taking an array of T by value is equivalent to a function declaration taking a pointer to T.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.