Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8880365
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T20:09:06+00:00 2026-06-14T20:09:06+00:00

Suppose I have a function that takes an r-value argument and I want to

  • 0

Suppose I have a function that takes an r-value argument and I want to provide a default value, how do I correctly specify that? The following works fine with gcc 4.7.0, but fails
with icpc 13.0.1.

struct data {
  int _data[10];
  data() = default;
  data(data&&) = default;
  data(const data&) = default;
};
void func(data&& = data{});

icpc complains that

error: type name is not allowed
void func(data&& = data{});
                   ^

Is this correct? What is the correct syntax?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T20:09:07+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 8:09 pm

    It appears that icpc 13.0.1 doesn’t support universal-initialization syntax in default arguments. This works:

    void func(data&& = data());
                           ^^ value-initialization
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following function that is suppose to take a value from a
Suppose I have a function that returns a certain value when it satisfies a
I'm trying to write a Powershell function that takes an array argument. I want
Suppose I have a function which takes a nullary functor as an argument: void
Suppose I have class Function , whose instances are callables that take one argument.
Suppose I have a function that returns a closure: sub generator { my $resource
Suppose that you have a function f: List a -> a such that f
Suppose that in the main I have a function a : a(c); and c
I have the following function that is supposed to trigger anytime one of the
Suppose I have a function void myFun(int*) In C++ what exactly does the following

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.