Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7647019
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T10:21:33+00:00 2026-05-31T10:21:33+00:00

Suppose I have a function that throws an exception. Suppose this function is called

  • 0

Suppose I have a function that throws an exception. Suppose this function is called by a third-party DLL, and the third-party DLL will handle the exception I’ve thrown.

If Visual Studio decides that the third-party DLL is not “user code” (as seen in the image below) then it will stop on my exception by default, even though it gets handled later. It isn’t exactly wrong to do so; it clearly explains that the exception was unhandled by user code. But what is it that makes Visual Studio call some DLLs “user code” and others not?

enter image description here

I had a theory that this happens because the symbols aren’t loaded, but there are modules in the list that have loaded symbols but are still not considered “user code”.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T10:21:34+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 10:21 am

    Yes, without a .pdb file the debugger can’t tell whether it is user code or not. It is explained reasonably well in the MSDN article:

    To distinguish user code from non-user code, Just My Code looks at three things: DBG Files, PDB files, and optimization.

    In a standard Debug build, optimization is turned off and debug symbols are created for all modules. When you run a debug build, those modules are considered to be user code. If I call a library function that is optimized and does not have debug symbols, however, it is not user code. Just My Code prevents execution from stopping at breakpoints in the library code, which is usually not code you are interested in debugging. In the Breakpoints window, those breakpoints will appear with the Disabled Breakpoint icon.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have a free function called InitFoo . I'd like to protect this
Please suppose I have a function that accepts a pointer as a parameter. This
Suppose I have this function: void my_test() { A a1 = A_factory_func(); A a2(A_factory_func());
Suppose I have a function which looks like this: template <class In, class In2>
I have a function that is called whenever a select changes. If the select
Suppose I have a very simple function that I expect the compiler to inline
I have a function I've written that was initially supposed to take a string
Suppose I have virtual function foo() in class B, and I need slightly different
Suppose I have a function: function my_function($a, $b, $c) { ... } I want
Suppose I have a function which can either take an iterable/iterator or a non-iterable

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.