Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9160855
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T13:50:11+00:00 2026-06-17T13:50:11+00:00

Suppose I have a global variable that contains a large structure: typedef struct {

  • 0

Suppose I have a global variable that contains a large structure:

typedef struct {
    char Big[1024]
} LARGE;

static LARGE x;

void main()
{
     free(x);
}

Can I safely call free(x) from main when I dont need it anymore?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T13:50:12+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 1:50 pm

    No. You didn’t dynamically allocate x so don’t need to (and cannot) free it.

    If you absolutely need to free the memory before your program exits, declare a pointer as global, allocate it on demand, using malloc or calloc, then free it when you’re finished with the structure.

    static LARGE* x;
    
    void main()
    {
        x = malloc(sizeof(*x));
        // use x
        free(x);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have a program that initializes a global variable for use by threads,
Suppose you have a static global variable in your header file, and you use
Suppose I have a static method of my class that returns an object of
Let us suppose I have 2 threads and a single global variable in a
Suppose I have a global variable a . And within a function definition, we
Suppose I have a large list of words. For an example: >>> with open('/usr/share/dict/words')
Suppose I have a pure virtual method in the base interface that returns to
Suppose I have a class Baz that inherits from classes Foo and Bar ,
Suppose I have a process that is updating a record and encounters a record
I currently have a Web Application that runs off a global Javascript-based API, and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.