Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 698445
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T03:16:33+00:00 2026-05-14T03:16:33+00:00

Suppose I have a list that I wish not to return but to yield

  • 0

Suppose I have a list that I wish not to return but to yield values from. What is the most pythonic way to do that?

Here is what I mean. Thanks to some non-lazy computation I have computed the list ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], but my code through the project uses lazy computation, so I’d like to yield values from my function instead of returning the whole list.

I currently wrote it as following:

my_list = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
for item in my_list:
    yield item

But this doesn’t feel pythonic to me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T03:16:34+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:16 am

    Use iter to create a list iterator e.g.

    return iter(List)
    

    though if you already have a list, you can just return that, which will be more efficient.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

suppose I have a list that comes from a database like this: List<Item> list
He're an interesting problem that looks for the most Pythonic solution. Suppose I have
Suppose I have two lists that holds the list of source file names and
Suppose class B extends class A . I have a List<A> that I happen
Suppose that you have a function f: List a -> a such that f
I have a very large list Suppose I do that (yeah, I know the
I'm using Protobuf-net. Suppose I have a list of Gizmo objects serialized and that
Suppose I have a doubly-linked list that has a pointer to the first node
Suppose I have list of words. I want to get words that end in
Possible Duplicate: Single Linked List is Palindrome or not Suppose i have a link

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.