Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6837375
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:28:10+00:00 2026-05-26T23:28:10+00:00

Suppose I have a multiplier code like this, module multiply( output [63:0] result, input

  • 0

Suppose I have a multiplier code like this,

      module multiply(
        output [63:0] result,
        input [31:0] a,
        input [31:0] b
      );

        assign result = a * b;

      endmodule

This produces a lot of gates.

What preferable method should be used to implement combinatorial multiplier?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:28:10+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:28 pm

    Hardware multipliers are big, you just have to live with it!

    Multipliers will get bigger as its input bit widths get bigger. So if you don’t need the full 32 bits on one of you operands, then reducing this size to the minimum will reduce the size of the resulting hardware.

    If you’re multiplying by a fixed number, I think the compiler can make some optimizations to limit the size of the hardware too. Or you can use different encoding schemes for the fixed number such as CSD that will reduce the number of adders in the multiplier, further reducing its area.

    If you need loads of multipliers and have a fast clock, maybe you can reuse a single hardware multiplier for many calculations. This means writing some control/pipelining logic to schedule your multiplies, and you might need some memory, but it can save you area overall. You’d be designing a mini-DSP datapath in this case.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have code something like this: #include boost/thread/mutex.hpp using boost::mutex; typedef mutex::scoped_lock lock;
Suppose I have some Python code like the following: input = open(input.txt) x =
Suppose I have a stringbuilder in C# that does this: StringBuilder sb = new
Suppose I have a class module clsMyClass with an object as a member variable.
Suppose I compile a source file file which contains this piece of code, struct
I have an sqlite query that looks like this: db_rows = db_cursor.execute( SELECT *
Suppose I have a class structure like the following, where I have a temporary
so 1GvG:s/..../g can replace over an entire buffer However, suppose I have multiple vim
Suppose multiple Modal Windows shown above each other. All of those have ShowInTaskbar =
Suppose you have 2 different ASP.NET applications in IIS. Also, you have some ASCX

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.